Legal Opinion

Akers v. Sinclair

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1950No. 31419PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hamley, J'.

These three actions, consolidated for trial and appeal, began as suits in equity to reform three certain promissory notes on the ground of mutual mistake.

Each plaintiff sought an adjudication that the note in question constituted an obligation of Dr. Wells Yakima Bottling Company, a corporation, and not of the plaintiff as an individual. In each case the defendant payee denied that there had been a mutual mistake, and cross-complained for judgment on the note. The corporation and its receiver were made parties to the action, but did not enter appearances and are not involved in…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kessinger v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Carew, Shaw & Bernasconi, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. New Georgia National Bank of Albany, Georgia v. J. & G. LippmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Germania National Bank of Milwaukee v. MarinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Denaxas v. Sandstone Court of Bellevue, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Denny's Restaurants, Inc. v. Security Union Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. Ell v. EllNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Leonard v. Washington Employers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API