Legal Opinion

Carvin v. Britain

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 2005No. 75626-1PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Bridge, J.

In 1989, after dating for several months, Page Britain and Sue Ellen (“Mian”) Carvin began living together as intimates. Five years later, they decided to add a child to their relationship and together artificially inseminated Britain with semen donated by a male friend. On May 10, 1995, Britain gave birth to a baby girl, L.B., and the partners began actively coparenting her, both taking a committed, active, and loving role in her nurturing and upbringing. Then, when L.B. was six years old, Britain and Carvin ended their relationship and an acrimonious spate of litigation over…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. McClarty v. Totem Elec.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re Custody of ShieldsWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Shields v. HarwoodWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API