Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Buckley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1908No. 7261PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Prater, J., entered December 19, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in consolidated actions for the annulment of a marriage and a division of property.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and decree rendered in two cases that were consolidated for trial, one being by the respondent against appellant Andrew Buckley for divorce or annulment of marriage and division of property, the other being by the appellant Philomene Buckley against appellant Andrew Buckley for a division of property claimed to have been acquired while he and she were husband and wife.

The material facts, as found by the court, and which we believe to be sustained by the evidence, were about these: On or about the 15th day of October, 1898, in the city of St. Paul, Minnesota,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Atherton v. AthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Barkley v. DumkeTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Cook v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Fuller v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Kenner v. KennerTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API