Legal Opinion

Venegas v. Luby

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1945No. 4900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The defendant below, Luby, seeks by review on appeal to reverse a decree of the trial court denying the existence of an easement for irrigation purposes on a certain tract of plaintiff’s land for the benefit of defendant’s land adjoining it on the west and enjoining the latter from maintaining irrigation ditches across the plaintiff’s land. In this suit one Charles A. Keeling and wife, Reba W. Keeling, also were joined as defendants but unless otherwise indicated any reference to a party as defendant hereinafter will intend Luby only.

The defendant as appellant in this Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Paine v. . ChandlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Wells v. . GarbuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Spencer v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Burling v. LeiterMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Miller v. SkaggsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Winrock Inn Co. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Los Vigiles Land Grant v. Rebar Haygood Ranch, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Otero v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Hughes v. LippincottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Ciolli v. McFarland Land & Cattle Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API