State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant State of Minnesota seeks review of the district court’s suppression of drugs found in a car where respondent was a passenger and also respondent’s custodial statements made to police officers. Because appellant has failed to show that the district court clearly and unequivocally erred, we affirm.
FACTS
In the past, an informant alerted the Jordan Police Department (JPD) to drug activity at a residence. Based on this informant’s tip, JPD obtained and executed a search warrant on the home. No drugs were found. Some months later, this informant called and again…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Villanueva v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Lewis v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Quentin Keith Orsten v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Beruk Meskelu ZeruCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Deon Sinkfield, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.