Legal Opinion
State v. Hince
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 15, 1995No. C9-94-699PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
On February 12, 1993 the respondent, 21-year-old Tom Dean Hince, was charged with gross misdemeanor theft and gross misdemeanor receipt of stolen property relating to the theft of a handgun, in violation of Minn. Stat. §§ 609.52 subd. 2(1), 609.53 (1994). At an omnibus hearing held on April 26 and July 12 respondent challenged the admission in evidence of a confession he made to his father, the Chief of Police of Lake Crystal, on the bases that he had no Miranda warning and that the confession was not voluntary. The trial court ruled that the confession was voluntary…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CamachoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. ShoenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. TibiatowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.