Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord v. East Bay Car Wash Partners (In Re Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING REMAINDER OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTION TO CLAIM
JAMES R. GRUBE, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the court are the remaining issues contained in plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment which the court has not previously considered. 1 These issues also encompasses the objection to defendant’s proof of claim filed by plaintiff. Plaintiff seeks a determination that defendant East Bay has no claim of any type in the bankruptcy case. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the remainder of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rex v. Chase Home Finance LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- In Re: Prestige Limited Partnership ConcordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Prestige Ltd. Partnership-Concord v. East Bay Car Wash PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000