Legal Opinion
State v. Huskie
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 18, 2002No. 2 CA-CV 2001-0057PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, J.
¶ 1 At the request of appellee the State of Arizona, the trial court entered a written money judgment for child support arrearages in favor of Christina Davis 1 and against appellant Thomas Huskie. Huskie appeals, contending the request for judgment was statutorily time-barred because it was filed more than three years after his and Davis’s only child had been emancipated. We agree and vacate the judgment.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The underlying facts are undisputed. In December 1982, the trial court dissolved the marriage of Davis and Huskie. Under the dissolution decree, Davis…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Hobson v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Padilla v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Norgord v. State Ex Rel. BerningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Ruhsam v. RuhsamArizona Supreme Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Robson Ranch Mountains, L.L. C. v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. HaydenArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Department of Economic Security v. DemetzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.