State ex rel. Department of Economic Security v. Demetz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 We are asked to decide in this appeal whether the annulment of a child’s marriage during her minority and before she would have otherwise become emancipated serves to revive the child’s unemancipated status, thereby rekindling a parent’s child support obligation. For the reasons that follow, we decide that the child’s unemancipated status revives in such circumstances.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Kevin Lee DeMetz (“Father”) and Cynthia DeMetz (“Mother”) married and had one child, Becky, who was born on July 29, 1983. Father and Mother divorced in 1985, and the superior court ordered…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State Compensation Fund v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Rineer v. LeonardoArizona Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- STATE EX REL. BRANNAN v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State ex rel. Arizona Department of Economic Security v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State ex rel. Thomas v. ContesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- ades/taylor v. PandolaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF ECON. SEC. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.