Legal Opinion
Robinson v. State
Utah Supreme Court
Decided March 6, 2001No. 990206PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Justice:
1[ 1 Appellants, a group of landowners, filed an inverse condemnation action against the State of Utah and its ageney, the Utah Department of Transportation (collectively "UDOT"). The case settled before trial, but the question of whether appellants were entitled to an award of attorney fees was left open. The district court denied appellants' motion for an award of attorney fees, and appellants appeal that decision. We reverse.
BACKGROUND
12 U.S. Highway 89 spans the length of Utah from Arizona to Idaho, connecting most of this state's populated areas. At some point in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. GallionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Chelmsford Trailer Park, Inc. v. Town of ChelmsfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Swenson v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Geisdorf v. DoughtyUtah Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. BriggsUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Long v. ETHICS AND DISCIPLINE COMMITTEEUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Gestational AgreementUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Foye v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.