Dixie State Bank v. Bracken
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ORME, Court of Appeals Judge:
Appellant Dixie State Bank seeks review of the trial court’s award of judgment in the bank’s favor. The bank contends reversible error was committed in awarding to it a considerably lower amount for recoverable attorney fees than was actually incurred. We agree and reverse.1
*986FACTS
The bank loaned Kirk and Linford Bracken $7,695 to purchase a 1979 pickup truck. The loan was memorialized in a promissory note for $10,094.40, which included the full amount which would become due, with interest, over the four-year term of the loan. The note unambiguously called for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Turtle Management, Inc. v. Haggis Management, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- Cabrera v. CottrellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Golden Key Realty, Inc. v. MantasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Hal Taylor Associates v. Unionamerica, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- Trayner v. CushingUtah Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.