Legal Opinion

Dixie State Bank v. Bracken

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1988No. 19375PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORME, Court of Appeals Judge:

Appellant Dixie State Bank seeks review of the trial court’s award of judgment in the bank’s favor. The bank contends reversible error was committed in awarding to it a considerably lower amount for recoverable attorney fees than was actually incurred. We agree and reverse.1

*986FACTS

The bank loaned Kirk and Linford Bracken $7,695 to purchase a 1979 pickup truck. The loan was memorialized in a promissory note for $10,094.40, which included the full amount which would become due, with interest, over the four-year term of the loan. The note unambiguously called for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Turtle Management, Inc. v. Haggis Management, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cabrera v. CottrellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Golden Key Realty, Inc. v. MantasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hal Taylor Associates v. Unionamerica, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Trayner v. CushingUtah Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API