Foye v. Labor Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
Judge Jill M. Pohlman authored this Opinion, in which Judges Kate A. Toomey and David N. Mortensen concurred.
1Opinion of the Court
POHLMAN, Judge:
¶1 Timothy Foye asks us to review the Labor Commission's decision denying his claim for benefits under Utah's Workers' Compensation Act. He alleges several errors related to the Commission's Appeals Board's (the Board) ultimate denial of benefits. In particular he argues that the Board exceeded its discretion when it overruled his objection to the medical panelists' qualifications to render a medical opinion in his case. He also contends that the Commission's rule R602-2-1(F)(3), which permits a respondent to require an employee to submit to a medical examination with the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Board of Education of the Granite School District v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BriggsUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Revne v. Trade CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948
- Columbia HCA v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- Hutchings v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- JBS USA v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Wright v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Fastenal v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Ramos v. Cobblestone CentreUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- Gamez v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.