Legal Opinion

Borchert v. Scott

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 19, 1970No. 5-5293PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. Fred Jones, Justice.

When this case was before us on direct appeal we held the Documentary Tax Stamp Act, being Act 239 of 1969, unconstitutional and void under Amendment 20 to the Constitution of Arkansas. Borchert v. Scott, et al, 248 Ark. 1041, 460 S. W. 2d 28. We have again considered the case on rehearing and have concluded that the Act is severable and that portions of it are constitutional and valid. In reappraising the intent of the legislature in enacting Act 239, we conclude that we cannot say the legislature would not have passed Act 239 without § 6 or subsections (b), (2) and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Bush v. MartineauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Gipson v. IngramSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. Levy v. AlbrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  5. Cribbs v. BenedictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Weiss v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Handy Dan Improvement Center, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Smith v. BentleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1980
  5. Swafford v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API