Legal Opinion
Handy Dan Improvement Center, Inc. v. Adams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 1, 1982No. 81-233PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Charles B. Roscopf, Special Justice.
This case concerns the constitutionality of the Sunday closing law, Ark. Act 135 of 1965 (codified as Ark. Stat. Ann. Sections 41-3852 through 41-3863 [Repl. 1977]). The Plaintiffs, seven private individuals and five retail establishments residing and doing business in Pulaski County, brought this action to enjoin the Defendants, five competing retail establishments, from engaging in retail sales on Sunday in violation of the act. The attorney general was made a party to this action as required by Ark. Stat. Ann. Section 34-2510 (Repl. 1962). While the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re HudspethUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1988
- Little Rock Family Planning Services, P.A. v. DaltonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1994
- Citizens Bank of Batesville v. PettyjohnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Hamilton v. Jeffrey Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
- Broyles v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.