Weiss v. McFadden
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jim Hannah, Justice.
The Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration (“DFA”) appeals an order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court granting partial summary judgment. The trial court found that the State violated Amendment 47 to the Arkansas Constitution when it attempted to tax benefits paid under an individual retirement account or a public or private employment related retirement system, plan or program (“retirement plan”), where the benefit taxed after-tax contributions being returned to the contributee.
This case involves only that portion of a retirement plan payment identified by the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Burcham v. City of Van BurenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- MacSteel Division of Quanex v. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Potter v. City of TontitownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Baker Refrigeration Systems, Inc. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Weiss v. MaplesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Weiss v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.