Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bentley

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided July 3, 1980No. LR-76-C-57PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The jurisdiction of the district court has been invoked in this case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343(3), 2201, 2202, 2281 and 2284. The plaintiffs’ claim for injunctive relief is premised on the substantive provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiffs in this action, desiring to provide clinical abortion services upon request, challenge the constitutionality of Ark.Stat.Ann. §§ 41-2551 — 41-2560 (Crim. Code 1976), Arkansas’ criminal abortion statutes. 1 Following the commencement of this suit the defendants were enjoined from enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. HigueraMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. In Re: Request of Lourdes A. Leon Guerrero, I Maga'Hågan Guåhan, Relative to the Validity and Enforceability of Public Law No. 20-134Supreme Court of Guam · 2023
  3. Josh Kaul v. Joel Urmanski, as DA for Sheboygan County, WIWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API