Legal Opinion

IN RE GRAND JURY WITNESS G.B. v. UNITED STATES

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 2016No. 15-CO-531PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Associate Judge:

In this appeal, appellant G.B., the victim of and witness to a stabbing, asks us to hold that “no valid investigative warrant may issue to forcibly take the DNA of a witness who is not suspected of the crime for which the DNA is sought.” We hold instead that, pursuant to Superior Court Rule of Criminal Procedure 41 and consistent with the Fourth Amendment, a search warrant may issue authorizing the government’s proposed buccal swab search (and incidental seizure) of G.B. for the purpose of collecting his DNA.

I. Factual Background

According to the Gerstein affidavit…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API