Legal Opinion
Haskell v. Brown
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 22, 2018No. Case No. 09–cv–04779–CRBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES R. BREYER, United States District Judge
In 2014, Defendants brought a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, arguing that this case, which challenges California's DNA Act, is foreclosed by Maryland v. King, 569 U.S. 435, 133 S.Ct. 1958, 186 L.Ed.2d 1 (2013). See Mot. (dkt. 151); see also Opp'n (dkt. 159); Reply (dkt. 162); 2014 Mot. Hearing (dkt. 167). The Court did not rule on the motion, however, instead staying the case pending final resolution of a similar challenge to California's DNA Act in state court. See Order Staying Case (dkt. 169). In April of 2018, the California Supreme…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Center for Genetics and Society v. Bonta CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. Lopez CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021