Legal Opinion

Sappenfield v. Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 19, 2005No. 22735-9-IIIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 The Department of Corrections (Corrections) reserves the right to withhold agency records from inmates, except for the inmate’s own file and health records. Corrections has a published procedure for providing additional records to inmates. Records requested by inmates are copied and mailed to the inmate, subject to a copying charge of 20 cents per page plus postage, payable in advance. Brandt Sappenfield challenges this procedure. And he sued when Corrections offered to mail the records he asked for but refused to arrange for him to inspect them in person at no charge. The court dismissed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hangartner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hangartner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Mithrandir v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Spokane Research & Defense Fund v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Livingston v. CedenoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Livingston v. CedenoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. McNabb v. Department of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. DeLong v. ParmeleeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. DeLong v. ParmeleeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API