Legal Opinion

Livingston v. Cedeno

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2008No. 79608-4PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

¶1 Michael Livingston challenges a split Court of Appeals decision affirming the denial of his motion for a show cause hearing brought under the public disclosure act, chapter 42.17 RCW (now the Public Records Act).1 *49In response to Livingston’s public records request, the Department of Corrections (Department) copied and mailed departmental records to him at the correctional institution where he was then incarcerated. Upon arrival, the documents were intercepted as “contraband” under the mail policy applicable to all incoming and outgoing materials. Livingston contends the Department’s action…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. State v. HartzogWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Tunstall v. BergesonWashington Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. City of Federal Way v. KoenigWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. City of Federal Way v. KoenigWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Morgan v. City of Federal WayWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Morgan v. City of Federal WayWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Columbia Physical Therapy, Inc. v. Benton Franklin Orthopedic Associates, PLLCWashington Supreme Court · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API