Legal Opinion
McNabb v. Department of Corrections
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 10, 2008No. 77359-9PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Charles R. McNabb seeks review of a published Court of Appeals decision affirming summary judgment in favor of the Department of Corrections (DOC). McNabb sued DOC and Joseph D. Lehman, secretary of DOC, in his official capacity (hereinafter collectively DOC), seeking to have DOC’s force-feeding policy declared unconstitutional, illegal, and invalid as applied to him and to enjoin DOC from enforcing the policy. McNabb argues that he has a right to refuse artificial means of nutrition and hydration arising independently from the explicit privacy guaranty in article I, section 7 of the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. Williams-WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Williams-WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Greenhalgh v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.