Legal Opinion
Mock v. City of Rome
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 29, 2012No. 6:10-CV-919PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
DAVID N. HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Michael Mock (“plaintiff’ or “Mock”) brought this action against defendants the City of Rome (the “City”) and the City of Rome Police Department (“RPD”) (collectively “defendants”) alleg*430ing discrimination under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. § 4311 (“USER-RA”), and New York Military Law section 318.
Defendants moved for summary judgment pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff opposed. Oral argument was held on March 23, 2012, in Utica, New York. Decision…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kassel v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Montoya v. Orange County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Mock v. City of RomeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Wang v. New York State Department of HealthNew York Supreme Court · 2013
- Beck v. NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.