Legal Opinion
Mock v. City of Rome
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 21, 2012No. 6:10-CV-919PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
DAVID N. HURD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Michael Mock (“plaintiff’ or “Mock”) brought this action against defendant City of Rome (the “City” or “defendant”) alleging discrimination under the Uniformed . Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. § 4311 (“USERRA”) and New York Military Law, section 242. At all relevant times, Mock was a member of the United States Air Force Reserve (“Reserve”), and was also employed as a police officer in the Rome Police Department.1
*431A jury trial was held in this matter on June 18, 19, and 20, 2012. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nimely v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Samuel S. SONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IVES LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Brady v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Keith Cross and Alfred Francis v. New York City Transit Authority and Gregory Warren, Docket No. 04-2912-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- AMW Materials Testing, Inc. v. Town of BabylonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kassel v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Donald Panarello v. State of Rhode Island, Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
- Bjelobrk v. Suffolk CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Hansen v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Matthew D. Bjelobrk v. Suffolk County et al.District Court, E.D. New York · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.