Lloyd & Elliott, Inc. v. Lang
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
This case is governed by the principles laid down in Ridgeway Dynamo etc. Co. v. Penna. Cement Co., 221 Pa. 160, 165, 70 A. 557; Tranter Mfg. Co. v. Blaney, 61 Pa. Superior Ct. 379, 383, and similar cases, 1 rather than the case of Feuerstein v. New Century Realty Co., 304 Pa. 271, 156 A. 110, relied on by the appellee and the court below.
The plaintiff is in the business of preparing and fur nishlng advertising service, including cuts or illustrations, to manufacturers and dealers in various lines of trade. It prepared a form of order to be signed by prospective…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gross v. Exeter Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Hill & MacMillan, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Feuerstein v. New Century Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Ridgeway Dynamo & Engine Co. v. Pennsylvania Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Tranter Manufacturing Co. v. BlaneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- LeDonne v. KesslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Suraci v. BallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- KoEune v. State Bank of Schuylkill HavenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Smiler v. TollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Stump v. StumpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.