Legal Opinion

Stump v. Stump

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1981No. 110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERTZ, Judge:

This is an appeal from an Order of support directing Appellant husband to make payment of seventy dollars per week, and of one-half the dividends on certain stock, to Appellee wife. Appellant contends that Appellee has failed to meet her burden of proving support entitlement inasmuch as no testimony justifying the entry of such an order was presented in the court below. We agree.

The pertinent facts of this case may be summarized briefly. Sometime after leaving the marital residence, Appellee filed for support. During a conference, held in the Dauphin County Domestic Relations…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AlmeidaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Paul v. PaulSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. McAlaineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Kurpiewski v. KurpiewskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Remick v. RemickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Schindler v. KenleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API