LeDonne v. Kessler
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellants contend that the lower court erred in entering summary judgment because it believed the parol evidence rule removed all material factual issues from their trespass suit. We agree and reverse the order of the lower court.
On August 31, 1976, appellants, Joseph and Barbara Le-Donne, filed a second amended complaint 1 in trespass against appellees, George and Emily Kessler, in the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas. Appellants made the following pertinent allegations: On October 1, 1973, they purchased appellees’ house and surrounding property in Ross Township, Monroe…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Bardwell v. the Willis CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Rempel v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Blumenstock v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Youndt v. First National Bank of Port AlleganySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.