State v. Clayton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
LINDER, J. pro tempore
Defendant appeals his conviction of felony violation of a court stalking protective order (VSPO), which can be charged and prosecuted as either a misdemeanor or felony, depending on whether a defendant has been previously convicted either of stalking or VSPO. ORS 163.750. Defendant argues that the evidence is insufficient to support the felony conviction; the state concedes that defendant is correct. We reverse and remand for entry of a conviction of misdemeanor violation of a court stalking protective order.
Defendant was tried by a jury. At the close of the state’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. HambrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Murray v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BranhamMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. PerelliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024