Legal Opinion

State v. Clayton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 3, 2007No. 0209-35369; A123517PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDER, J. pro tempore

Defendant appeals his conviction of felony violation of a court stalking protective order (VSPO), which can be charged and prosecuted as either a misdemeanor or felony, depending on whether a defendant has been previously convicted either of stalking or VSPO. ORS 163.750. Defendant argues that the evidence is insufficient to support the felony conviction; the state concedes that defendant is correct. We reverse and remand for entry of a conviction of misdemeanor violation of a court stalking protective order.

Defendant was tried by a jury. At the close of the state’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. HambrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Murray v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BranhamMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. PerelliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API