Legal Opinion

Columbia River Gorge Commission v. Hood River County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 7, 2007No. 050051CC; A129652PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

2004 Ballot Measure 37, now codified at ORS 197.352, includes an exception for land use regulations “[t]o the extent the land use regulation is required to comply with federal law.” ORS 197.352(3)(C). The question presented in this appeal is whether certain county land use ordinances that restrict development of properties within the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area fall within that exception. The trial court answered that question affirmatively, and, as amplified below, so do we. Accordingly, we affirm.

The facts material to our review are undisputed. In the November 2004 general…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. ClowesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Chartrand v. Coos Bay Tavern, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Zimmerly v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API