Legal Opinion

United States v. Fraza

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 21, 1997No. 96-1219, 96-1220PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAILEY ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge.

James Fraza and his son Scott (“James” and “Scott,” collectively “defendants”) were indicted on various counts of fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1041, 1341, 1344, 1346, and violations of the Taft-Hartley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 371, arising from a scheme to defraud a credit union. After a four day jury trial, both defendants were found guilty on all counts and now appeal their convictions and sentences. We affirm, with a minor exception.

I. Background

In 1989, James offered to purchase 80 acres of land in Coventry, Rhode Island, from George Dupont (“Dupont”). The agreed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Curtis EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Kurian ChackoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. DupreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph v. NASH, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API