Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph v. NASH, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 25, 1997No. 91-50760, 92-50310, 92-50374 and 93-50694PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed February 6, 1996, is withdrawn and the opinion below is filed in its stead.
OPINION
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Joseph Nash appeals his convictions of making false statements to a federally insured lending institution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 and bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § ,1344. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231, and this court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. In light of United States v. Wells, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 921, 137 L.Ed.2d 107 (1997), and Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 1544, —…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Darren Eugene HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. BlitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Michael A. YasharCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.