Legal Opinion
United States v. Curtis Evans
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 3, 1998No. 97-3445PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BECKER, Chief Judge.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Curtis Evans appeals from his conviction on various fraud-related charges. The primary question presented, which arises out of Evans’ judgment of sentence, is whether the district court erred in conditioning his supervised release on reimbursement of the cost of court-appointed counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d). We conclude that it did, and therefore vacate that portion of the judgment. We also remand for further sentencing proceedings because of the inadequacy of the district court’s findings supporting its determination of the amount of loss from…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Larry KoppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. John W. McDowell Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Kevin Davis, at No. 02-4521 Kevin A. Minnis, at No. 03-1130 Reginal Scott, at No. 03-1160Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Daniel VoelkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Calvin Edward PrudenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Donald James KingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.