Legal Opinion
Den-Gar Enterprises v. Romero
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 29, 1980No. 3771PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDREWS, Judge,
The plaintiffs sued to quiet title to land claimed by them and Den-Gar, 1 and to recover damages for slander of title. Den-Gar counterclaimed for quiet title. The district court, sitting without a jury, ruled in favor of plaintiffs.
In its appeal Den-Gar raises three main issues:
1. Is review of the trial court’s denial of defendant’s Rule 41(b) motion permitted where defendant, after denial of the motion, elected to present evidence on his own behalf?
2. Is there substantial, admissible evidence in the record to support the trial court’s decision?
3. Are the attorney’s fees…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Smith Petroleum Service, Inc. v. Monsanto Chemical Company, Monsanto Chemical Company v. Smith Petroleum Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Garver v. Public Service Company of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. LardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- The Wealden Corporation and Edward G. Uhl v. Joseph J. SchweyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Waters v. BlocksomNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Vaughn v. United Nuclear Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Ratzlaff v. Seven Bar Flying Service, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Texas National Theatres, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Horgan v. FeltonNevada Supreme Court · 2007
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.