Legal Opinion
Enrico St. Cyr v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 1, 2000No. 1999PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge John M. Walker, Jr., filed an opinion in dissent.
OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge:
The ease before us presents legal questions of reviewability and retroactivity under the 1996 amendments to the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). Congress amended the INA through the enactment of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 et seq. (1996) and the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (“IIRIRA”), Pub.L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009-546 et seq. (1996). These laws severely narrowed the rights of certain classes of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Orville Cephas v. John Nash, Warden, Ray Brook Federal Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Athanasios Theodoropoulos v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Pedro Velasco-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Thomas Anthony Dalton v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.