Legal Opinion

United States v. Pedro Velasco-Medina

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 12, 2002No. 01-50064PublishedCited by 191 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TROTT, Circuit Judge.

Pedro Velasco-Medina (“Velasco-Medi-na”) appeals his jury conviction and sentence for attempted reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and his sentence for falsely representing himself as a United States citizen, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 911. Velasco-Medina offers two grounds for overturning his conviction for attempted reentry: (1) his indictment was defective because it failed to allege specific intent, and (2) the underlying deportation proceeding violated his due process rights under the Supreme Court’s decision in INS v. St. Cyr, 533…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by191 opinions

  1. United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. William WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Jose Francisco Nunes v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  5. United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API