Legal Opinion
Galazo v. City of Waterbury
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 20, 2004No. 3:01CV1589(DJS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
SQUATRITO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jose Galazo brings this action for money damages against defendants the City of Waterbury, Kevin Daly, Jr., Simon DelBuono, Martin Toma, Michael Pieksza, Jr., Mark Santopietro, James Nardozzi, Charles Sampson, and Gary Pelosi based upon the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants the City of Waterbury, Santopietro, Nardozzi, Sampson, and Pelosi (hereinafter “defendants”) have filed a motion for summary judgment (dkt.# 43), which, for the reasons set forth herein, is GRANTED in part and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roberts v. BabkiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Holman v. CascioDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Acevedo v. SklarzDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Zainc v. City of WaterburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Ankhenaten Ra El v. CrainDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.