Legal Opinion
Acevedo v. Sklarz
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 16, 2008No. Civil Action 3:06cv931 (SRU)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION
STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Francisco Acevedo, Jr. (“Acevedo”) and defendant James Parizo (“Parizo”) have each filed a motion for reconsideration of my oral ruling on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, which I granted in part and de nied in part at the motion hearing held on February 26, 2008. Specifically, Pari-zo seeks reconsideration of my ruling denying summary judgment on all the Fourth Amendment false arrest, false imprisonment, unlawful search and seizure, and malicious prosecution and related state law claims against him.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hazelwood School District v. KuhlmeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- DeFABIO v. East Hampton Union Free School Dist.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Harasz v. KatzDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Lawson v. HilderbrandDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Armstrong v. MartocchioDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Friedman v. Bloomberg LPDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.