Legal Opinion
Holman v. Cascio
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 29, 2005No. 3:93-r-00030PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DRONEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Randall Holman, brought this action against the defendants, John Cascio and Michael D’Amato, two police officers of the Town of East Haven, Connecticut, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The defendants are sued only in their individual capacities. The complaint sets forth claims for false arrest and malicious prosecution in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This opinion considers the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
I Background
The following facts are undisputed: On October 29,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Ricciuti v. N.Y.C. Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Roberts v. BabkiewiczCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Russo v. City Of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Russo v. City of BridgeportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Pizarro v. KasperzykDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Justin F. v. MaloneyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.