Mansfield v. Chambers
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding in mandamus, instituted by the plaintiff, to compel the defendant, as controller of the state of California, to draw and deliver to the said plaintiff a warrant on the state treasurer of the state of California for the sum of two hundred dollars for services alleged to have been performed by the plaintiff during the month of January, 1914, as superintendent and cashier of the motor vehicle department of the office of secretary of state.
The petition alleges that Frank C. Jordan, secretary of state of the state of California, under and by virtue of the power and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pennie v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Miller v. KisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Marquis v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Millholen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Risley v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- In Re CaspersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Azevedo v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.