Marquis v. City of Santa Ana
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff was elected to the office of city assessor of the defendant on the 13th of April, 1891, and entered upon the duties of his office April 20,1891. Previous to his election, viz., March 16,1891, the salary of that office had been fixed by an ordinance of the city at three hundred and seventy-five dollars per year, payable one-half thereof on the first Monday of July, and one-half thereof on the first Monday of September. March 2, 1891, the legislature passed an act (Stats, of 1891, p. 22) providing that in cities in this state, excepting municipal corporations of the first, second,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Risley v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- State v. StockwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- State ex rel. Gentry v. Mayor of Village of DodsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Kelly v. KaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Mansfield v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.