Legal Opinion

Berry v. Maine Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 30, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

It is now clear to all who have an awareness of how our State government operates that the Public Utilities Commission performs a most important function in carrying out the task our Legislature has seen fit to assign to it. Because of its importance, its activities are properly subject to close and critical study by this Court when issues arising from its activities are properly presented to us.

Before us for decision is an appeal taken pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 303 from a deci sion of the Commission and a complaint filed pursuant to 35 M.R.S.A. § 305 arising from the same…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
  3. Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  4. Casco Bay Lines v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Scott v. Central Maine Power Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1989
  4. Mallinckrodt US LLC v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  5. Martin v. Unemployment Insurance CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API