Legal Opinion
Scott v. Central Maine Power Co.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided March 13, 1989No. Civ. 85-0187 BPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CYR, Chief Judge.
Defendants Bradford and Moskovitz move to dismiss on the ground that they are absolutely immune from suit and, therefore, that the amended complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff objects to the United States Magistrate’s recommendation that the motion to dismiss be granted, see Scott v. Central Maine Power Company, Civil No. 85-0187-B, Recommended Disposition of Motion of Defendants Bradford and Moskovitz to Dismiss (D.Me. June 8, 1987), and the court undertakes de novo review, see 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paul E. Bettencourt, M.D. v. Board of Registration in Medicine of the Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Destek Group, Inc. v. New Hampshire Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Diva's, Inc. v. Bangor, City ofCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Campbell v. MacHias Savings BankDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1994
- Feliciano v. Puerto Rico State Insurance FundDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.