Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. David
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1946No. 424PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
This case is before us on appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal.
Appellant had sued in the trial court, claiming damages for the alleged malicious prosecution of a landlord-tenant action. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. After argument by counsel the trial court granted the motion to dismiss. This was on June 20, *851946. Plaintiff took no appeal from said judgment of dismissal.
Twenty days later, on July 10, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint and tendered the proposed amendment with the motion. After hearing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kirshon, Et Ux. v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Conrad v. MedinaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Ray v. BruceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Consolidated Radio Artists, Inc. v. Washington SectionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Dante v. BagbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mitchell v. DavidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947