Legal Opinion
Conrad v. Medina
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 1946No. 366PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
Plaintiffs, as landlords, sued defendant, as tenant, for possession of housing accommodations under the District of Columbia Emergency Rent Act1 on the ground that they desired it for their own immediate and personal use as a dwelling. The parties, together with their respective counsel, entered into a written stipulation that the tenant would consent to judgment provided she was granted a 60-day stay of execution, with the right to ask for a further stay in the event she was unable to find satisfactory living quarters by November 4, 1945. The case was called in open…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. McLemoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- Nolan v. WerthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Lineker v. DillonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1921
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. DismangCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re J.D.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- In Re Ko. W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Cutler Associates, Inc. v. Merrill Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Bell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Finance America Corp. v. MoylerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.