Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. David
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 18, 1947No. 468PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
The parties are here for the second time, litigating the same controversy.1 Originally appellant filed a complaint for damages in the trial court charging that defendants had filed a landlord-tenant action (which she identified by its case number) in a fraudulent attempt to oust her of possession of property in violation of certain alleged lease rights. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, which motion the trial court granted. Later plaintiff sought leave to file an amended complaint, such leave was refused, and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cleveland v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Olsen v. Muskegon Piston Ring Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Mitchell v. DavidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clay v. FaisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Amos v. SheltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Raimonde v. PurcellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- Simmons v. Central Charge Service, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Amos v. SheltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985