Legal Opinion

Brewer v. Washington RSA No. 8 Ltd. Partnership

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2008No. 33642PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

Appellants William and Robert Brewer appeal a district court order granting Respondent Inland Cellular summary judgment on their rescission and unjust enrichment claims. We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand for further proceedings.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Brothers William and Robert Brewer (the Brewers) are tenants in common with their aunt, Madlynn Kinzer, and other family members of property located on Moscow Mountain, Latah County. The Brewers each own a collective, undivided one-sixth interest in the property, and Kinzer owns an undivided, one-third…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Badell v. BeeksIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Thomson v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Yoakum v. Hartford Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Kolln v. Saint Luke's Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re G-Fees Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Brewer v. Washington RSA No. 8 Ltd. PartnershipIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Dawn A. Maciosek v. Victor G. DowIdaho Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. Hopkins v. Wright (In re Labbee)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2016
  5. Lincoln Land Co v. LP BroadbandIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API