Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1910No. Civ. No. 707PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing to vacate the judgment. C. N. Post, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

This was an action to compel defendant by mandamus to draw his warrant for the sum of $503.16 in favor of plaintiffs, on the county treasurer of Sacramento county.

Plaintiff had judgment, from which and from the order denying his motion to set aside and vacate the judgment, defendant appeals.

It appears, from the finding marked IX, that the board of supervisors, on August 6, 1907, duly passed an order declaring that it was necessary that a bonded indebtedness be incurred “for the purposes hereinafter stated,” and, to that end, the board ordered that a special election be held “for the purpose…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of San Luis Obispo v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. McMahon v. Board of Supervisors of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Williams v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Bank of Lowell v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Oven v. AusleySupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Chapman v. City of FullertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API