Legal Opinion

Hart v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2000No. 29857PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is a proper person appeal from a district court order denying a motion to withdraw a guilty plea brought subsequent to entry of the judgment of conviction. We hold that the district court erred in considering the motion as a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in concluding that it was untimely, pursuant to NRS 34.726(1). However, we further hold that the equitable doctrine of laches applies to motions to withdraw a guilty plea that are brought after sentencing. Applying laches to the instant case, we hold that the district court reached the proper result.…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hargrove v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bryant v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Edwards v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. McConnell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. MosesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. Little v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. BarahonaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API