Hart v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is a proper person appeal from a district court order denying a motion to withdraw a guilty plea brought subsequent to entry of the judgment of conviction. We hold that the district court erred in considering the motion as a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in concluding that it was untimely, pursuant to NRS 34.726(1). However, we further hold that the equitable doctrine of laches applies to motions to withdraw a guilty plea that are brought after sentencing. Applying laches to the instant case, we hold that the district court reached the proper result.…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hargrove v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Bryant v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Edwards v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by21 opinions
- Evans v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- McConnell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MosesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Little v. WardenNevada Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BarahonaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.