Legal Opinion

Little v. Warden

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2001No. 35433PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The United States District Court for the District of Nevada certified the following question for this court’s determination: “Is a conviction of sexual assault infirm when it is based on a guilty plea in which the defendant was advised of the mandatory minimum sentence but was not advised that the crime was nonproba-tional?” We conclude that a defendant must be aware that his offense is nonprobational prior to entering his guilty plea because it is a direct consequence arising from the plea. However, in so concluding, we emphasize that in considering whether a particular defendant was…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hargrove v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Christopher C. Little v. Jacqueline Crawford Frankie Sue Del PapaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. McConnell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CatanioNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Nollette v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Palmer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API