Legal Opinion

United States v. Timmreck

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1979No. 78-744PublishedCited by 973 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The question presented is whether a conviction based on a guilty plea is subject to collateral attack whenever it can be shown that Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure was violated when the plea was accepted.

In this case, acting on the advice of counsel, respondent pleaded guilty to a charge of conspiracy to distribute various controlled substances. As required by Rule ll, 1 the District Judge formally addressed respondent and determined that there was a factual basis for the plea and that he was acting voluntarily. The judge explained that respondent could receive a sentence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by973 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

968 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API