Legal Opinion

Bryant v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1986No. 15336, 15852PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In these two consolidated appeals, we are faced with challenges to the validity of two guilty pleas. In both cases, the defendants challenge their pleas on the ground that they were not entered knowingly and intelligently because the lower courts did not sufficiently canvass them to determine if they understood the nature of the charges to which they were pleading guilty.

In the past, this court has been faced with similar challenges to guilty pleas, and has on those occasions set forth the criteria necessary for the entry of a valid plea. See, e.g., Hanley v. State, 97 Nev. 130, 624…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Higby v. Sheriff of Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Hanley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by93 opinions

  1. Means v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bargas v. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Christopher C. Little v. Jacqueline Crawford Frankie Sue Del PapaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. McConnell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Franklin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API